Part Two
Christianity Opposes Science
In
Part One it was pointed out that the notion of the Church opposing science was
not a legitimate assumption. Further it
was seen that a survey of the greatest scientists and scientific discoveries
would support the notion that it was not the Renaissance but the Reformation
that saw the uptick in scientific discoveries.
In
the course of those discussions there still remained several matters to
discuss. Among them are the following.
Answering the Specific Inaccuracies
All Knowledge in Scripture
No knowing person says that all knowledge
resides in the Scriptures. That is in
fact a misrepresentation of the truth that the
foundation of all knowledge resides in the Scriptures. That is to say that Scripture does not exhaust all science but merely provides the foundation or the basis of science and knowledge.
Certainly as limiting as is that statement,
still there are those of secular mindset who would disagree. However, the point to consider is that the Scriptures
reveal the Divine and the Divine is the basis of all reality, therefore the
Divine is the basis of all true science.
The
argument goes something like, because Galileo embraced the Copernican theory
and therefore he fell into disfavor and was banned from teaching. The facts are quite different.
Pope
Urban VII initially supported Galileo but because of political difficulties and
court intrigue and threats against his reign as pope, plus a misstep by Galileo
in assigning the Popes words to a scientist known as Simplico (often wrong and
inaccurate in his science) he fell out of favor and thus was placed under house
arrest.
Miraculous
Events
As
the result of the Age of Enlightenment, Modernism became popular among
scientists and others who pursue knowledge.
Thus there is a belief in truth but that truth is contained in a closed system. Therefore, miracles cannot exist for there is
nothing outside the closed system.
Others,
generally people of faith believe that the system is not closed but open and
that the Divine can interrupt the natural forces and causes of life at any time
of His choosing. This is the
Judeo-Christian truth paradigm.
Conservative
Christians Opposes Science
Those
how hold to this idea again paint Christianity with a broad brush. Take for example the question of creation or
evolution. The fact is that Conservative
Christianity is far more accepting of variations in belief. From the Divine start of everything to those
who believe God started the processes and then took His hands off, Christianity
has a big tent. Much bigger than that of
the secular evolutionist.
Evolution
or Intelligent Design
Interesting
how militant the evolutionist has become when genuine questions are asked as to
the veracity and proof for his theory.
Even while casting doubt upon the evidence for creationism, such people
conveniently look past the problem that they cannot answer. For example,
Decline:
Left on its own every system
decays toward chaos and yet the evolutionist postulates that it is exempted
from this descent.
Intermediary Fossils: Of the over 50,000 plus fossils, the evolutionist
cannot produce one intermediary fossil.
There is no part monkey, part man.
Faulty Assumptions: The evolutionist discounts honest science
when it produces data that does not suit the evolutionist's presuppositions and yet is willing to accept the mythical theory
of evolution in the place of honest scientific work.
First
Causes
Among
the various issues that the Modernist scientist with their closed system theory
cannot explain is that of first causes.
Assuming for a moment that the “Big Bang Theory” is true, what caused
the Big Bang and from where does matter, time, and energy originate.
While
the Big Bang does explain that there was a beginning, closed system science is
at a loss as to how or why it happened.
Oh, certainly there are those who place their faith in theoretical
mathematics, theoretical physics and the like.
Problem is even if they unravel the Big Bang to some new theory as
frequently is the case, they still cannot explain the origin of the universe.
Publically
Funded Education
The
creationist and intelligent design camp is asking for equal time with the
evolutionist. When ever Creationism is brought up, the evolutionist decries it as indoctrinating kids with a wild myth. Yet, if anyone remotely suggests that public education refrain from teaching evolution they immediately fall into disfavor. Teaching both seems to be only fair since
it is not just the evolutionist that pays to fund public education.
Background
To see the list of
subjects to be discussed in this series see my blog (Christianity – Is it a
Faith Driven by Fear?). Contained within that blog is a reference, 20
Reasons to Abandon Christianity and in that reference is a list which is
the springboard from which this subject has been discussed.
No comments:
Post a Comment