Tuesday, December 10, 2013

“Where is the Character?”

“Where is the Character?”

There is a cost to character!  The question one must ask is this.  Am I willing to pay the price to be a man or woman of character and therefore excellence?
CHARACTER CRISIS
Consider a case in point.  The owners along with management of an NFL team lead the head coach to believe that though the season has not gone well, he will be continued in his position.  He is allowed to go out into the community and speak about the season ahead and his hopes for the team.  At the same time and unbeknown to the coach the team owners and management approach another coach and hire him to replace the current coach.  Where is the character of the men who did such a thing?
The new coach accepts the position knowing full well that because he does so, the current head coach will be fired.  There is no indication that he surfaced concerns as to the commitments made to the present coach.  Where is the character of the man who did not do so?
Consider another case in point.  The head football coach of a university has repeatedly and openly stated his commitment to remain in his current position.  As the season draws to a close and unknown to the faithful he is approached by another university to become their head coach.  Even though the team is going to a bowl game, he accepts the new position and leaves immediately for the new position.  Where is the character of the man who did such a thing?  Where is the character of the university that approached him, asking him to leave before the season is over?
Consider another case in point.  The university that lost the head football coach does the same thing to another university as they approach their head coach.  That coach accepts the position even though his team has not completed its season and is bowl game bound.  Again, where is the character of the university and the man who accepted their offer before his season was over?
Not only is there a character crisis on the part of the NFL organization, the two universities mentioned and the three coaches referenced but there is a very clear message sent to the teams and the students.  It is this.  Commitment and therefore character does not count for the sake of expedience, for a winning season, and for one’s personal desires and convenience.
CHARACTER/IDENTITY FORMATION
A brief survey of the literature yields the point that character begins to be formed somewhere between the age of three and twelve BUT one does not establish ones’ identity in and of themselves until sometime between 20-25 years.  Further those with troubled pasts, from broken homes, and those experiencing other kinds of mental-emotional trauma will slow the process.
CHARACTER/IDENTITY ILLUSTRATED
Here is the seriousness of this matter. 
Take a high schooler who in middle school begins to show some talent for football.  His coach plays him a great deal and he becomes a standout.  He goes on to high school where he again receives special treatment and begins to view himself as special. 
He is then recruited out of all of his peers to play at one of the universities referenced above.  Remember now this is while still in a character/identity formation modality.  He is still trying to find himself and here is a leader, the head football coach.  This is the man who leads his referent group the team.  He is a man who presents a persona to be admired. 
Our young man is under his leadership for the next four or five years.  His character/identity is continuing to be formed, largely influenced by this group is being led by a head football coach.  Let us then say that he makes the NFL team in question at age 21 or 22.  He again is selected ahead of his peers and part of his formation is that he is special and because he is special he can live beyond the expectations of others.  Remember he is still in formation mode and he now begins to see and be influenced by others like team owners who have possessions, power, position, and prestige. 
So now his world is distorted by his being “special” and his referent group, the team is populated by role models who are men who live above what is normal for most folks.  These very same men make decisions not based upon character but upon expedience.
Now here is the question.  What kind of a person does he become whenever it is that his character/identity formation nears completion?  His head football coach has abandoned a commitment made for an opportunity.  The universities have made decisions because to win at any cost is a cheap price to pay.  The owners of his NFL have the same attitude.  No one has made the tough character decisions and the player is still in his character/identity formation stage of life.
THE OUTCOMES
The names that could be listed are common to many sports fans.  One CNN poll spoke of NFL felons, rapists, and ex-convicts.  Others could be added such as alcoholics, the sexually promiscuous, gang bangers, drug abusers, and those guilty of gross misdemeanors, etc.  Is it any wonder to any of us that these sports heroes whose formative years were spent being told they are “special” and falling under the men of “character” as described above end up as moral decadents?
THE CHALLENGE
It is time for those who have been entrusted with the education of those in character/identity development in the classroom, on the sports field, and in the business of sports to establish standards of character.  Not just establish them but live by them, model them, and yes, require them of these young athletes.  It is time to evaluate men not on winning seasons but on how they model and thus contribute to the formation of integrity, honesty, thrift, and a whole host of other character qualities.
MY PROTEST--I GIVE UP
If it matters to you which I am sure it does not, now you know why.
Why, with the exception of soccer, I’ve given up on professional sport in general and the Seattle Seahawks and Mariners in particular.  
Why I’ve given up on the magic of opening day and holding our country's flag on that opening day at Safeco .  
As well, why I have given up on college sports in general and University of Washington sports in particular.  
Will I miss them?  Yes, of course.  I will miss the Saturday afternoons and Sunday afternoons immersed in a game.  
Will they miss me?  No, they do not know I exist so it will not matter to them but I know I exist and therefore it does matter to me.  Guess I will try high school sports and see how that goes.

Sunday, December 1, 2013

“Atheism and Judeo-Christian Belief and Outcomes”


“Atheism and Judeo-Christian Belief and Outcomes”
Recently in a discussion about the veracity of Christianity a comment was made about atheists and that it was secularism that is responsible for more death than all religions combined.  In response a comment was made something to the effect that, “You cannot lump all atheists together because there is a great difference in and among us.”
While only the most naïve would question the truth of the response, there came a further discussion.  You see the person defending atheism was very adept at dividing out all atheists while at the same time grouping all theists together.  Then as the argument progressed the theists would be labeled because of the excesses of a few.  
Among the arguments tendered was the notion that Theism in general and Judeo-Christian belief in particular was and is not a valid truth system because of the Crusades, the Inquisition, and other overreaches by “Christians.”  Thus the Christian “truth” system is invalid.  Of course no such criterion was applied to atheism.
So in the course of the discussion it became apparent that there were two different standards by which to evaluate belief systems.  The system embraced could be hospitably accepted despite its excesses while the other is disproved by similar excesses. 
However, while discounting a truth system based upon excesses may be valid and true, it is also legitimate to note that one can argue for the veracity of any overarching truth system by looking at general trends and outcomes.  For example while both atheism and theism can “take a bad rap” for the times in which they have devalued human life, there is a glowing difference and it is found in outcomes.
Travel from the destructive end of the scale to what have both systems contributed to the betterment of mankind.  Even a cursory reading of history (not revisionist history but genuine history) will show it is those who’ve embraced Judeo-Christian truth that have added to the quality of life for mankind in general and people in particular.
Those things that we assume and thus presume upon in the West like benevolent government, places that serve the sick and dying, and benevolent organizations etc. all had their start because of the Judeo-Christian truth ethic.  As well helping and service organizations in many cases had their start because of the Judeo-Christian truth paradigm. 
Look to science and medicine and one finds the same to be true.  Look to humanitarian organizations and one find that most of them come or at least had their start as faith based organizations.
So when one evaluated the claims of the atheist truth system in its multivariate sub-parts and Judeo-Christian truth system in its multivariate sub-parts there is one question that demands an answer.  It is not that of excesses and misdirected people for both systems have many.  However, it is this.  
"Generally speaking, which system has done the most good for humanity?"