Egocentricity or the notion that the self is the center of all in one’s
world is an argument some attempt to make against the validity of
Christianity. The criticism is presented by some to be a logical reason
to discount if not abandon Christianity. In the following few comments
you will notice that again and again it is a matter of what one presupposes to
be reality.
The Origin of the Standard
The
first problem in the argument is in the field of values. The premise
underlying the argument is that egocentricity is wrong. So that occasions
a question. “Wrong by whose standards?” If it is some standard
based upon one’s own morality, does that not say the individual postulating the
argument is egocentric? Then too, the secularist’s notion of the survival
of the fittest is also based upon a very egocentric supposition about the
origins of life. Without any deep examination it seems that the underlying proposition, the assumptions necessary for the argument are in trouble.
Egocentric Christianity is Impossible
In
the ego-centric argument there is another problem. Does it not seem a bit
strange that it is offered at once as a central tenant of Christian belief and
also as a reason to abandon it? The idea being that if it is the ego need
construct that makes Christianity function, would it not draw people to the
construct, and yet it should be one of the reasons to abandon it.
Upon what presumption can the notion even be proposed?
However
here we arrive at another problem with the assumption. If such is a
central tenant of Christian faith, it would be the only exception to the
destructive nature of selfishness. Selfishly egocentric and sociopathic
people do not form the kinds of bonds that allow for groups to function.
Therefore the bonding and connection that characterizes true Christianity would
not exist and the system would deconstruct into nothing but an historical
movement.
Egocentric Christianity is Illogical
Okay
assume for a moment that such egocentricity in Christianity is so.
Somehow the logic of the argument is lost as it seems that if one is egocentric
and if Christianity is as represented such would only drive one deeper into the
belief system. Such would answer the mantra of the egocentric “What is in
it for me?” It would validate Christianity. Problem is as
previously noted, egocentricity works against the social fabric of a group or a
culture.
Limited God View
Another
issue in the argument is based in the notion that egocentric Christians pray but because God suffers under some anthropomorphic limitation or another any perceived answer is invalid. It is speculated that God cannot possibly
answer all of the prayers of these egocentric Christians. The reality is that
God is exponentially greater than any one man or group of men can possibly
fathom. Then take it a step further. Add into the equation that the
creation reflects the creator but is never greater than the creator! Thus again the one who proposes this criticism has elevated himself to a very egocentric position.
To
accept a limited view of God is to create a finite god that does not
exist. Then as in other arguments such is an attempt to use the limited
god to prove that the infinite God does not exist. Somehow the logic of
the argument suffers under a problem—it is illogical. It is tantamount to
saying little green men do not exist so big white men can’t possibly
exist. The argument is illogical, flawed, and indefensible.
Misplace Egocentricity
However,
there is another issue of egocentricity evident here. How is it that the
one who claims that there is no God can do so?
The
Universe: Has
such a person examined every inch of the universe, every one of the thousands
upon thousands of solar-systems? Has he looked into every subatomic
particle throughout that universe?
Dimensions: Has such a person examined completely and
thoroughly the four dimensions of which we know? What about additional
dimensions, the seven more that may exist (theoretical
mathematicians/physicists are working on this one)?
Mathematics
and Physics: Has
he examined every single mathematical probability and discovered it is far more
likely that reality came by chance than by design. Has such a person
examined in intimate detail every truth paradigm and all of the attendant
arguments?
First
Causes: Maybe
it is just that he has not shared his work in his discovery of first
causes? Does he know what led up to the “big bang” and scientifically
validated his discovery? Has he unlocked the key as to why
evolution is the one and only exception to the multiplicity of systems which
are unraveling into chaos and entropy? Oh, let us not forget time.
Has such a person examined every moment of every second for as long as he
postulates there has been time?
If
someone makes such a claim without having done all of these investigations and
more, has he not set himself up as an authority? In that is he not demonstrating
the very egocentricity that he decries and claims invalidates
Christianity? Therefore, if you accept the processes by which he
validates his argument, then if you accept Christianity as invalid based upon
egocentricity then he invalids his own argument!
Lost Logic
Again,
the logic of the argument is lost somewhere along the way but then that is not
to be of any great surprise for it is those who value truth that require there
to be sound logic. It is the egocentric who claim special truth as in the
argument against the veracity of Christianity. Either tacitly or directly
such special truth provides a license for such argument as is necessary and if sound
logic is sacrificed for the sake of an argument that ultimately leads to chaos,
so be it.
The De-anthropomorphize God
Of
course there is another choice and that is to de-anthropomorphize God. It
is then possible to accept the existence and benevolent intervention of an
infinite God in the affairs of mankind in general and a man in
particular. That makes some other impossibilities very possible.
For
example a limitless God can answer prayers for parking places and at the same
time for miracles. A limitless God can in fact have a plan for each and
every man, woman, boy, and girl without disenfranchising others.
A
limitless God can take what appears to be catastrophic failure and weave it
into the life of the victim and turn it to great good for that person and for
others. A limitless God can give victory when all seems lost. It is
possible to understand that such plans as God has for man and mankind are not
ego-centric but altruistic. So too the people who follow that God
(e.g. genuine Christians) are also not egocentric but altruistic.
Background
To
see the list of subjects to be discussed in this series see blog (Christianity –
Is it a Faith Driven by Fear?) in that blog is a reference and in that
reference is a list which is the springboard from which this subject has been
discussed.
No comments:
Post a Comment