The following is adapted from a post
by a Russian Orthodox Abbott...
“Situation Ethics versus Biblical
Morality”*
(In
part)
“Situation
ethics has become the norm for our times, having replaced the biblical ethics
of past generations. In situation ethics as long as no one is hurt one can do
as one pleases. Taking drugs, watching pornography and aborting the unborn
child, all can come under the flag of situation ethics.
The (Church)
Fathers knew that even the secret sins committed by people had an effect on the
whole of the cosmos. The people who promote situation ethics would have us
believe that nothing that is done in private hurts anyone. Biblical ethics
tells us quite the opposite.
Love in Christ,
(Name
withheld)
The Outcomes
Man is
vested by God with the power to make choices but man is not vested with the
power to control the outcomes. Think for
a moment about the consequences of the choices you’ve made in life.
Romans 1
tells the reader that God eventually is abandoned and abandons—that is God defers
to a person’s choice to abandon Him. Only
God knows how many made some small choice but down range it ended in a major
and catastrophic eternal failure.
Choices! Yet until one dies, there exists the opportunity
for choosing a different pathway. Jesus
call is to all, “Come unto me all you who labor and are heavily laden and I
will give you rest.” God’s way or man’s
way, at times it seems but a simple choice but the consequences are enormous
and pushed out to their logical ends are eternities apart.
*Full article may be found at "Morning Offering" check blog list at right. As well in most of my writings current cultural values are described by mores and morals as opposed to ethics which are eternal, transcendent, objective, etc. realities.